Your AI systems are making consequential decisions right now — without formal governance, without traceable authority, without enforceable ethical constraints. Regulators are asking for evidence. ARCHAI™ is the answer.
The EU AI Act is in force. High-risk AI systems without formal governance documentation face fines up to €30 million or 6% of global annual turnover. Most organizations are not compliant.
Every organization deploying AI faces the same six failures. Any one of them is a regulatory liability. All six together is an existential risk.
When your AI system makes a consequential decision, can you produce the complete audit trail — model version, training data, parameters, human authorization? Regulators are asking. Most companies cannot answer.
Who in your organization has the formal authority to deploy an AI system? Change its parameters? Expand its scope? Shut it down? If the answer is informal, you have no governance.
Your AI ethics principles exist as a document. They do not constrain operational decisions. A principle that says "we will be fair" has no enforcement mechanism. That is not governance.
When an AI system produces a biased output or fails unexpectedly, what is your formal response? Most organizations improvise. That improvisation is what regulators classify as a governance failure.
Most AI deployment decisions rest on vendor claims and internal assumptions. There is no formal system for distinguishing what is known about your AI system's behavior from what is assumed.
Most AI governance is documentation produced after the fact for an auditor. That is theater. ARCHAI™ builds governance into operations so compliance is a byproduct of running the system.
ARCHAI™ is mapped to all current and emerging AI regulatory frameworks. Implementation produces compliance as a byproduct — not a separate exercise.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024)
Risk classification, conformity assessment, technical documentation, human oversight, incident reporting. ARCHAI™ addresses all high-risk AI system requirements under the Act.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
The four functions — Govern, Map, Measure, Manage — are operationalized across all 14 ARCHAI™ domains. ARCHAI™ is the implementation engine for NIST RMF compliance.
ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System
The enterprise AI governance certification standard. ARCHAI™ implementation satisfies ISO/IEC 42001 operational requirements. ARCHAI™ is the engine — ISO 42001 is the certification.
US Executive Order 14110
Federal AI governance requirements for safety testing, transparency, and risk management. ARCHAI™ satisfies federal contractor AI governance documentation requirements.
GDPR Article 22 — Automated Decision-Making
Rights to explanation and human review for automated decisions. ARCHAI™ Causality and Phenomenology domains produce the explainability record Article 22 requires.
UK AI Safety Institute Framework
Evaluation, testing, and red-teaming requirements for advanced AI systems. ARCHAI™ Optimization and Resilience domains operationalize UK AISF requirements.
ARCHAI™ applies the complete Archonomy discipline architecture to AI governance. Every domain addresses a dimension of AI governance that existing frameworks leave undefined.
Every other AI governance framework produces documentation. ARCHAI™ produces operational governance — formal constraints that are enforced, decisions that are blocked, records that are immutable. Compliance is a byproduct of running the system.
Every AI decision produces an immutable audit record. Every governance action is authorized and logged. Every ethical assessment is permanently stored. When a regulator asks, you produce the record in minutes — not weeks.
Ethical constraints in ARCHAI™ are not aspirational. They are operational. An AI output that violates a defined ethical constraint is blocked before downstream action. The block is logged. It cannot be overridden without governance authorization.
ARCHAI™ classifies every AI system by risk level before deployment. Risk level determines governance requirements. No system operates without classification.
ARCHAI™ is implemented through a structured advisory engagement. At the end of 12 weeks your organization has a running governance system — not a report.
The first step is a 30-minute conversation. We will tell you exactly which of your AI systems are at risk, what regulators would find if they looked today, and what ARCHAI™ implementation would look like for your organization. No obligation beyond that conversation.
Request Your Assessment — hello@archai.io